| |
|
| |
Nov 17, 2006 3:25 pm |
|
re: re: re: Sanadhana Dharma Part III |
Ganesh Ram
| |
Salil, from your Kabir quote, But wouldn't that mean one is confining god to a particular place? And what about those that are non-living? Which will take us to the prahald version where it said, that prhalad counters his father by saying, he is in the pillar as well as in the minutest particle. Which then would bring us to a question then if he is prevalent everywhere , how can we eat god, walk on god, kill anyone for god is everywhere.
Would it not then
if the GOD was/is within Rama, he/she/it was/is there within Ravana?
Doesn't Gita say that to us?
Then if we do consider Krishna as a GOD then wouldn't that mean that duryodhana a part of Krishna (by definiton of Krishna) is killed by Arjuna who is none other than Krishna himself(again by definition of Krishna)? Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|