|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Mar 07, 2007 12:11 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: re: Sanadhana Dharma |
Gyro
| |
GR,
Leaving aside Holland company failure in demolishing the bridge, I am more interested in formation of bridge natuarlly and geological inputs this regard. (Q – 1 a,b,c,d & 2 of my post Mar 05, 2007 1:08 am).
If you say that Shivaties have been downplayed by breaking the shivadanush, then I would say Ravana – a great shiva bhaktha is also equivally responsible for that. Because he also went to suyamwara and made attempts to break that shivadansh. He did not even respect that shivadanush being a great shiva baktha but Rama did before lift it and therefore he could break it. (Bakthi is important. That is the reason it is said that Hanumar could walk on seawater by chanting Rama’s name but when Rama did the same he could not). As Ravana did not respect the Shivadanush and also made severe attempt to break it he is the one who tried to put down Shivaties. Is this the way we wanted to discuss or argue??
Rama not only asked Sita to get into the pyre, even after that she was left in forest when pregnant. The great princes Lau & Kus took birth in forest. Ramayana did not hide these informations. Whoever taught about these incidents would deliberately hide the real reasons behind it to put its value down. It is because Rama is the king of country and he has to completely sacrifice his personal desires to protect the interest of public. ( I hope you remember the dialogues between dry cleaner and his wife). This shows the unselfish attitude of Rama. That is why he is great in that way. Whereas Ravana abducted others (Rama’s) wife. And he is great in your view vis-ŕ-vis Rama !!
In respective epics the hero/heroine character would be highlighted. In Shiva puranam Shiva would be projected more prominently and in Ramayanam it is Rama. For political benefit people like DK would misinterpret it. Because they are the one saying that Rama is an Aryan and Ravana is Dravidan therefore we should try to support only Ravana at any cost. (I have already provided link that proved Aryan invasion theory wrong). They foolishly thought that ‘being against Brahmin’ is ‘being against god’ when there is no god portrayed as Brahmin. The prime god of Hinduism - Rama & Krishna were not Brahmins. They were Kshthriyas. Till today nobody know what caste is lord Shiva. If lord Brahma is Brahmin, then all Brahmins should worship only Brahma in temple. There is no such practice. Even this simple truth this DK people do not know. But we are adamant in believing in their foolish propagate. (Even the Gayathri mantra chanted by brahmins three time every day was given to the world by Raja rishi – A Kshtriya later became saint knows as Vishwamitra - a non-brahmin)
Rama & Lakshmana would have got permission from lord Shiva before fighting/killing Ravana IF Ravana had got approval from lord Shiva to abduct Sita :-)
Private Reply to Gyro (new win) |
|
| |
|
