|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Mar 08, 2007 6:56 am |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Sanadhana Dharma |
Gyro
| |
Hi GR - Why vibeeshana alone? Could Rama fought and won the war without Hanumar or the army of Vanaras or Lakshmana? It is the war strategy to get support from wherever possible. The same was applied by lord Rama going by Kshthriya dharma. (This similar kind of approach you can see in Mahabhratha too applied by both sides). Rama was a good listener and not a dictator. Interestingly you agree that Rama – the lord is projected as only taker – What more evidence one want than this for the honest approach in Ramayana that cite as proof that the incidents have been given as it is.
It was also painful for Rama to send Sita to forest. But he deserved to be good king. That was his first priority and being good husband was next to that. In too many places valmiki narrates the emotional part of Rama and his struggling to fight with enemies. Ramayana do not hide these. Yes, in stories villain character would be projected as you mention. But a great hero – worshiped as god – avtar of Vishnu would be projected weak openly? What was the difficulty for a storywriter to project Rama as more powerful then anybody else therefore he did not struggle at all to fight with anybody?
Can you please give me some info about Sangamithra.
Private Reply to Gyro (new win) |
|
| |
|
