|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Mar 08, 2007 2:59 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: Sanadhana Dharma |
Ganesh Ram
| |
Sumanth,
I agree natural laws are immutable but they are flexible and preceptible based on the interpretation. Since interpretation is a trait of living things and depends on the knowledge or lack thereof, it is Time that determines how the laws are interpreted and followed.
I will continue with the homosexual marriage example I gave. In the Hindu pantheon of gods we have at least one instance of homosexuality and one of eunuchs that I know of which are cleverly disguised.
While the idea of homosexual marriage was there in our own India, it was twisted to satisfy the public. So is the accetance of eunuchs in our society. Of course I am talking about Ayappan and Ardhanareeswara here.
Then we can look at Polyandry and polygamy, Artifical births. Birth out of wedlock and the list goes on. Everything that a society practiced or shunned were/are part of our epics and historical stories. Some of them are justified and some are vehemently opposed. As Time passed, polyandry was totally unaccepted in many parts of India. Polygamy became a big NO NO.
If we follow the immutable static laws then we would end up without a civilization is my opinion, And this is not possible at all unless we tend to equate whatever incidents that happen to be Natural
Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|
