| |
|
| |
Mar 08, 2007 5:27 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: Sanadhana Dharma |
Ganesh Ram
| |
Sumanth, what in your view would be a natural Law?
Static and Dynamic aspects are highly debatable. Like I have said earlier (probably in the second and\or first part)it depends on which POV we take. Here is another example, For many of us the Sun is one huge ball of Fire. This is true looking at the SUN from where we are. But there are others who have found Sun Spots and we also have come to know of Sun flares and we know it has Hydrogen and there are countless nuclear reaction that takes place in it. We also know whatever we see as happening in sun with our naked eye has happened 8 earth seconds earlier.
where am I going with my example? I am trying to gain weight to my side of the argument that other than Time there are no Natural Laws. And by itself Static and Dynamic are based on Frame of Reference.Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|