|
|
|
|
| The Post your web site for expert review Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts |
| www.falkon.in | Views: 214 |
| Oct 23, 2006 6:59 am | | www.falkon.in | # |
Indu Moola | | Do check my website www.falkon.in......m ready for the comments guys Private Reply to Indu Moola |
| Oct 23, 2006 1:30 pm | | re: www.falkon.in | # |
 Reg Charie | | Nice design but to get traffic you are going to have to develop a large link campaign as your site will never be found in the search engines.
Reasons for the above are, You use a splash page. Your HTML site is only images. Using images of text does not give the search engines any content. THey are looking for text.
RegPrivate Reply to Reg Charie |
| Oct 23, 2006 1:40 pm | | re: www.falkon.in | # |
 >> Barry Caplan - Start Your Future Today | | Are the designs original or template based?
I ask because the html portion of your site is not xhtml/css based, and so as a potential client I am forced to wonder if you are up to working with the latest standards or not?
If so, then why not show off a bit on your own web site? If not, won;t that leave your clients at a disadvantage?
Best,
BarryPrivate Reply to >> Barry Caplan - Start Your Future Today |
| Oct 27, 2006 3:53 am | | re: re: www.falkon.in | # |
Indu Moola | | Hello reg,
Thanks a lot...we are working on changing the image on the site to text only for SEO....but wanted to know that if we have two format...flash & HTML ..can the site be optimized.
best regards
InduPrivate Reply to Indu Moola |
| Oct 27, 2006 4:39 am | | re: re: www.falkon.in | # |
Indu Moola | | Hello barry,
The design is ours.. we are working on the changes on the HTML links.. Also are updating on the latest web technologies...
Any info on web 2.0 that you could provide...
Indu MoolaPrivate Reply to Indu Moola |
| Oct 27, 2006 12:45 pm | | re: re: re: www.falkon.in | # |
 Reg Charie | | Hi Indu, As far as SEO goes flash is pretty much a total loss. The search engines look for content when indexing and Flash just does not provide any.
RegPrivate Reply to Reg Charie |
 |
|
|