| |
Legal Needs
| [This Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts] | | Topics |
|
| |
Dec 09, 2008 5:44 am |
|
|
Ritu
| |
Why do behavioral scientists prefer lawyers to rats for their experiments? 1) there are more of the lawyers to work with, 2) lawyers are more expendable, 3) lawyers do more harm to society than rats, 4) lab assistants are less likely to develop a bond or feel sympathy for lawyers, 5) rats arouse more feelings of compassion and humanity, 6) rats have an innate right to life and liberty, 7) rats have more dignity, and 8) there are some things even a rat won't do.
What is the only disadvantage to using lawyers instead of rats in laboratory experiments? It's harder to extrapolate the test results to human beings.
Private Reply to Ritu (new win) |
|
| |
|