|Feb 22, 2009 11:03 am
||re: re: Dorvak says SEO URLs suck.
|| Hey Folks.
I agree with Kent. What works can depend on overall
structure and how well the search engine reads whatever
structural elements are used.
I don't know anyone who "knows it all" when it comes to SEO.
It appears that folks who try to play google (to game it)
do so at their own peril.
Dorvak may have conducted his experiment at odds with other
factors. Who knows? I certainly didn't see any proof that
he even understood all that might be necessary to facilitate
a real "study" on the subject.
"The idea to change the URL is not a bad idea IF, and only
IF, the Google search bot does not read the URL properly
and does not list it. This used to happen. However Google
has progressed far beyond not being able to read dynamic
URLs and this is no longer the case. "
Apparently some folks think this is necessary:
"It has only been in the last year or so that search
engines have really spidered dynamic urls with a high level
of success, and some spiders don't appear to do a good job
Web Development - http://www.bekansas.com/
SEO Copywriting - http://www.buddycopywriting.com/copywritinghome/
Web Site Graphics - http://www.buddywebgraphics.com/
ABHP - JOIN this ACTIVE Ryze Network! - http://abhp-network.ryze.com/
Private Reply to Eileen Brown (new win)