| |
|
| |
Feb 22, 2009 11:26 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Dorvak says SEO URLs suck. |
Stephanie Longfellow
| |
What ever happen to being "User" friendly? How are you going to get the page views if users don't click on them? If your content is something work looking at, then users are going to spread the word by sending the url to a friend or bookmarking your site. I know if I am recommending a site to someone I would much rather say go to www.mysite.com/newsarticles vs www.mysite.com/2007/new_articles/1003/article_on_something_really_relevant.html...
Rediculous...
My site gets all the hits I need and I use the good old fashion structure. www.mysite.com/pagename.html. Easy. User friendly.
I agree with Dorvak. We should just keep it simple and quit trying to trick Google. You'll just end up being blacklisted. Private Reply to Stephanie Longfellow (new win) |
|
| |
|