|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Dec 03, 2009 3:00 am |
|
re: re: re: 35 Inconvenient Truths > Australia's Parliament defeats global warming bill |
Thomas Holford
| |
John Stephen Veitch sayeth:
"You won't be alive to see the world population plunge from 8 billion to 3 billion inside 10 years, but I'm sure that's where we are heading."
This is a circumspect way of acknowledging what the eco-fringe really believes: there are TOO MANY HUMAN BEINGS ON EARTH!
I am always astonished that seemingly intelligent people who profess to be "humane" and "ethical" never seem to recognize or articulate the implications of their beliefs.
If there are too many people, some of them need to go away "for the good of humanity".
If some people have to go away, it really doesn't make any difference from an ecological perspective WHO goes away.
There are people have have always been blamed or implicated in humanity's problems: Jews, blacks, whites, Germans, etc, etc.
A book written in the eve of World War II entitled "Germany Must Perish" rationalized the the sterilization and extermination of all Germans.
So, why NOT just get rid of all Jews, or all "white supremacists", all infidels, or all "primitive races"?
If there are 8 billion people on the planet, but 5 billion of them are "unnecessary" and 3 billion of them are worth keeping around, I'm wondering if you include yourself among the 5 billion or the 3 billion.
And if you are among the 5 billion, you and your carbon footprint are an insupportable burden for the rest of us. The most ethical course would be to make you "go away" sooner rather than later, so we can solve the "externality problems" sooner rather than later.
T. Holford
Private Reply to Thomas Holford (new win) |
|
| |
|
