|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Feb 18, 2010 10:14 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: The Death of Global Warming |
Ron Sam
| |
Nefarious Left-wing Cabal Behind Climate Research
The ethic of reciprocity is also known as Golden Rule.
The Golden Rule is an ethical code that states one has a right to just
treatment, and a responsibility to ensure justice for others. It is
also called the ethic of
reciprocity.
It is ignored
for the following reasons:
These obstacles
to living by the golden rule are sometimes cited:
- * People dispute the meaning of the golden rule
- * Ego involvement
- * treating jerks as they deserve to be treated
- * self defense
- * punishing enemies
- * needing to win and defeat rivals
- * oppression makes compassion difficult
- * People may become disappointed or resentful if
they are not treated as well in return as they perceive they have
treated others
- * People may expect to be treated as "well" as they
treat others
Center for American
Progress
It was created in 2003 as a left-wing alternative to think tanks such
as the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute. Its
President and Chief Executive Officer is John
Podesta.
(2 links)
The Center for American Progress is classified as a 501(c)(3)
organization under U.S. IRS. The institute receives approximately $25
million per year in funding from a variety of sources, including
individuals, foundations, and corporations. From 2003 to 2007, the
center received about $15 million in grants from 58 foundations. Major
individual donors include George Soros, Peter Lewis, Steve Bing, and
Herb and Marion Sandler. The Center receives undisclosed sums from
corporate donors.
Clinate Progress
is the Climate blog of
the Center for American Progress Action Fund
Enter: The Nefarious
Left-wing Cabal Behind Climate Research .
George Soros
Regarding Real
Climate November 20, 2009, The CRU hack;
There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George
Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to
‘get rid of the MWP’, no admission that global
warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no
‘marching orders’ from our
socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put
this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though.
How interesting. Never mind the dubious veracity of most of
that…nobody reporting on Climategate had even mentioned
George Soros.
Regarding, Daily
Tech: September 2007, Update: NASA, James Hansen, and the
Politicization of Science;
In 2006, Hansen
accused the Bush Administration of attempting to censor him.
The issue stemmed from an email sent by a 23-year old NASA public
affairs intern. It warned Hansen over repeated violations of
NASA’s official press policy, which requires the agency be
notified prior to interviews. Hansen claimed he was being
“silenced,” despite delivering over 1,400
interviews in recent years, including 15 the very month he made the
claim. While he admits to violating the NASA press policy, Hansen
states he had a “constitutional right” to grant
interviews. Hansen then began a barrage of public appearances on TV,
radio and in lecture halls decrying the politicization of climate
science.
Turns out he was right. Science was being politicized. By him.
A report
revealed just this week, shows
the ‘Open Society Institute’ funded Hansen to the
tune of $720,000, carefully orchestrating his entire media campaign.
OSI, a political group which spent $74 million in 2006 to
“shape public policy,” is funded by billionaire
George Soros, the largest backer of Kerry’s 2004
Presidential Campaign. Soros, who once declared that
“removing Bush from office was the “central
focus” of his life, has also given tens of millions of
dollars to MoveOn.Org and other political action groups.
Certainly Soros has a right to spend his own money. But NASA officials
have a responsibility to accurate, unbiased, nonpartisan science. For Hansen to secretly receive a
large check from Soros, then begin making unsubstantiated claims about
administrative influence on climate science is more than suspicious
— it’s a clear conflict of interest.
If you can connect the dots of the Golden Rule and Neo-Marxist ideology
with junk science, you may understand what is being foisted upon you.
If your post toasties were taken away, the chance to crap in them is
gone, eh? |
Private Reply to Ron Sam (new win) |
|
| |
|
