|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Feb 23, 2010 2:59 am |
|
re: re: re: Economic Issues |
James Booth
| |
.
Yes, in part.
When the "state" - government, at any level - that government legitimately formed BY The People, which IS The People, and operates FOR The People - NOT the form of government we have today - requires supply of some commodity, or service, that "state" (a town mayor could do this, State Governor, or president of nation) might issue its own "tender" - legal currency within the limits of that *jurisdiction* - which tender or currency could then be used by farmer, or tailor, or one engaged in transport for hire, to exchange for service or commodity that business owner requires to continue operations, including payment for wages of those who freely provide their labour toward those operations, and such currency would continue to circulate within that jurisdiction, finding its way back to the farmer or tailor or teamster as one or another person within the community also requires products and services from same.
The difference should be plain to see: there is no siphoning off of any portion of "assets" or "produce" or "energy" in the form of interest (rent) paid toward the *financing* of government operations by a "third party" outside, disinterested, and irresponsible (to The People) entity which thrives only on The People's (and thus government's) need for "liquidity".
_
Seems to me we survived many thousands of years without a "global economy"
... and will no doubt do so again as result of our current "crisis"
- a *crisis* which I believe no doubt has been brought on by design to *congeal* the so-called "global economy" - not for our (general population) benefit, but for those who have created yet another "war" (disruption of the flow) so as to create more short-term streams of "income" as the "rebuilding" process has to be financed for the "victors" to show themselves as "benefactors"
Whatever alternative approaches we design and implement individually, in small groups of "family and friends" and extending to neighbours, and to neighbouring villages and towns, have already been labelled "financial terrorism".
We know that as we "nibble away" (the best we can do initially) at the profits of The Money Power, especially in the Digital Age where our thoughts and movements are "plain to see" by anyone who wants to track them, The Money Power will resist our efforts the more our efforts affect its "bottom line"
If we get too big individually, we fall; if we stay low, we "get big" collectively.
Whether such a "movement" will even have any real effect seems doubtful, but cannot be realized at all without some attempt at it.
Such "scale" begins always with the individual, how the individual chooses to live, whether to honour the Light or dwell comfortably in the Darkness, what example the individual sets, first and primarily for self, but as well for others to choose, if they will, to follow, or better, on which to improve, and then demonstrate as a yet better example (evolution of society).
As ever, it is those small steps, or utterances, of some "crazy" who might, for instance, declare the Earth is actually *round* instead of flat, which spark paradigm shifts.
I have come to a point in my life where I have decided the "bloody revolution" is nothing more than the "last stand" resistance of The Money Power to a *paradigm shift* that is not in its interest
... and of course as "bloody revolution" is *war* it is thus another "profit center" for The Money Power.
We win through not playing by someone else's rules.
If you have what you believe to be a good idea as alternative to "what is" then do it, and if others like it, they will do it too; if they do not like it, they will tell you.
As you discuss merits of an idea you both like, together you will "tweak" it and improve it and begin your own Kaizen with it, and you just do it.
That is, after all, what the "caravaneers" did, on the road, when they first thought of writing "extra" (counterfeit) receipts for the "valuables" they had been trusted to store, but which folks in the next town could not possibly count to verify.
To this day, the success of their "idea" has been in keeping it secret - quite the same reason The Federal Reserve today will not allow its "books" to be audited, or that there are not records of the activities, during its first hundred years of existence, of the Bank of England.
Just do it, as they say : )
You are a cell member of a financial terrorism network.
Just do it.
JB
Private Reply to James Booth (new win) |
|
| |
|
