|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Aug 24, 2005 2:48 am |
|
re: re: Ryze vs. LinkedIn |
Dean H.
| |
Joe,
I think Ryze is older than LI. I believe Ryze was started back in 2002. LI may have started in 2003.
re: convuluted and not friendly.
Yes, I hear this all the time. As Scott and Bill will tell you, you have to use LI with a different approach than you would use Ryze. Ryze is obviously meant to be more interactive. LI is meant to be used differently. Hence the perception of "sterile".
It doesn't make LI less effective, it is just meant to be used differently from a different group of business professionals. But it is fast and efficient, depending on what your business needs are. Based on your profile, I don't think LI would be effective for your business.
But going back to my original query, I, along with my friend, are curious to know why LI is growing at a faster rate than Ryze. Does this mean Ryze doesn't have as good of a product? Does this mean LI is able to implement certain mechanisms within their infrastructure to help increase the word of mouth marketing machine?
Inquiring minds want to know...
Private Reply to Dean H. (new win) |
|
| |
|
