|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Dec 07, 2005 9:37 am |
|
re: re: re: SaNaDaNa Dharma |
| Bharath Cola
| |
Hi Ramanathan
Interesting to note that what I tried to communicate in the earlier debate is what you have highlighted and also contradicting the same :-)
When I said there was no Hinduism in original, what I meant was -- as a religion there was no religion NAMED as HINDUISM and you also agree to it when u say that Persians called us as Hindus because we settled near INDUS. In which case we are using a borrowed persian terminology to identify our religion... thats the irony what i wanna highlight to probably one of the oldest civilisations of this world - NO ORIGINAL NAME. how strange!!!
Anyway the details of Shiva and Shakthi does not approve of HINDUISM being existant. They are just details - though interesting data, except for one - India was not named as Bharat after Rama's brother.
As per mythology, our country was named as Bharat after Bharat - the son of Shakuntala and Dushyant(king of Hastinapur) much before Ramayana came into existance. He was a very brave child and ruled Hastinapur for very many years after his father - all this in mythology, so to say!
Cheers
ColaPrivate Reply to Bharath Cola (new win) |
|
| |
|
