| |
|
| |
Dec 07, 2005 1:03 pm |
|
re: re: re: SaNaDaNa Dharma |
Ganesh Ram
| |
I simply am surprized when people attribute and define something that can neither be attributed (read as cannot have any attribute) nor be defined(read as that which cannot be defined).
I also feel the very idea of attributing depends on the degree of macroness or microness one uses to look at things. At the most micro level or at the macro level one does see uniformity. It is the in-betweens that shows different levels/degree of attributes and therefore various interpretations.
BhArat as for as I know came from shakuntala's son. Also we simply do not know how far and wide was bhArat at those time. probably the so called hinduism should be attributed to places in now afghanistAn.
Siva , shakti all are later gods compared to prajApati. If I am correct, Shiva came into existence when prajApati tried to "go" with the celestial star Rohini.Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|