|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Dec 13, 2005 5:52 am |
|
re: re: re: re: re: How AIDS evolved? |
Abhishek Kumar
| |
>>I was talking of attitude and not the actual action please.
I am also talking of the attitude. That is why I used the word "similar". Attitudinally, do you think both are similar.
>>2. Do you agree that AIDS is not caused by having multiple partners but by spread of the virus through blood, pregnancy or sex?
>>Pl. read kinky-African-sex theory.
I have done so Mr. Raam. And what is implied by that? Please google "How AIDS is transmitted"
>>pre - AIDS days also AIDS was existing but scientists did not have the advanced scientifical equipment to identify HIV. We know science just few centuries before. It does not mean that sciece was not existing prior to that.
This is rather interesting. You seem to have a very interesting relationship with Science. When science seems to be helping you (mostly through misinformation) prove a point, you make sweeping statements like "Scientists agree...." but otherwise you seem to have a special body of knowledge that scientists are completely unaware of. According to everything we know, AIDS is a recent disease. But you differ, and unlike poor scientists...who have to prove everything... you can just make any statement that suits you and say "Science didn't know about this!!"
And that is not even my questions.
My question is and you seem to be answering everything except what I am asking "In the days where there was no AIDS, would pre-marital sex have been okay?"
>>>>4. Please clarify whether you think pre-marital sex is a bad idea (because of AIDS, unwanted pregnancies etc...) or do you think it is immoral, an absolute wrog - universally?
>>Pre-marital sex is very good idea, and it is moral and absolutely right. We will communicate this message to our current generation and also pass it on to our future generation too. Abishek, we analysed so much in the earlier discussion about it, again you are asking this question to me.
I am glad you agree. If you are being sarcastic or funny... well, I seem to have missed the point.
In absolute terms, in absolute reality, as far as universal truths are concerned... do you consider pre-marital sex to be a sin, immoral.
Or, do you think that it is a bad idea because of its social implications.
You have an open mind, Sir... your page says so. Are you judging others? Is judging spiritual? Is judging the path to self realization? Private Reply to Abhishek Kumar (new win) |
|
| |
|
