|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Jan 24, 2006 5:59 am |
|
re: re: Indians & Sanadana Darma |
Gyro
| |
Dear Ganesh Ram,
I hope that I can convince you for all our religious beliefs. The problem is because, we think that Science has frame work to arrive at some decision logically whatever it proves. On the other said we believe there is no via media to check that religious matters are true.
Eventhough the number goes up to infinity, the basic numbers are only from 0 to 9. So, even you see multiple Indian societies (which follows SaNaDaNa Dharma) they all come under whatever Mathvachariyar, Adisankarar and Ramujum analysed and conveyed.
Science teaches us that human beings are evolved from monkey. Have any one ever observed the evolution with their own eyes, about the process? Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavour, should we come to conclusion that there would be no truth in it? This was found out based on observations, assumptions and human intelligence. Our Indian science is based on this kind of framework.
Science has developed a technique (Tentrocnology) to find out age of trees, with the pieces of it, that is thousands of years old. With this they decide the age of tree. But what is the concrete proof that their finding is right? Similar to carbon dating and radio metric dating also.
According to empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol of science there is no such things as cold. Heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, just the absence of it. We can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold.
Similarly, Darkness is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light.... But if you have no light constantly, you have nothing and its called darkness, isn't it? In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?
In the similar manner, our rishis have found that Death is not the opposite of life: just the absence of it. And it will again have a life (rebirth). But we will consider this as ‘mystics’. It is because Present generation of Indians are put in to modern school of science where there is no opportunity to study Vedas. Right from childhood our brain is formatted in such way that only modern science and its inventions are much more superior than what is said in our Upanishads. And there is no opportunity for us to learn Sanskrit in Schools as curriculum to appreciate and understand our scriptures to the core.
Today's modern science doing lots of research on Quantum mechanics that was practiced by our ancient rishis much earlier. Our physical body emits certain frequency based on our thoughts, accumulated knowledge and willpower. Those frequency will be received by like minded people and disturbed by opposite people. This is how our rishis were able to make happen certain things sitting in one place with highly channalised concentration power (plus mantra power - that is again one more big subject). You could have heard even today some people say that Saibaba is seen in many place in the same time. If I think of Namitha while watching cricket in my house, I am partially in my house (may be 50%), partially in cricket ground (40%) and partially with Namitha (10%). This is how a single person is seen in different places. I gave this just as an example as layman explanation to quantum physics.
Indian Science is mainly based on faiths, beliefs, and meditative power. As we all study only Modern Science we seek for logical explanation and proofs for each and everything. Our brain can't accept knowledge transfer of Vedas and source of it, which is the root cause of all knowledge, when we say that it was learned by us naturally from sky. Science will say that mind does not exist, because it can't be proved. We measure Indian science with the available resources of today's scientific techniques and knowledge. If our scientist find out some modern equipments to communicate with nature (which mind does), then it would be quite possible that Indian science would be accepted worldwide
V.K.L. Raamanathan
Private Reply to Gyro (new win) |
|
| |
|
