|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Jan 24, 2006 12:59 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: Indians & Sanadana Darma |
Ganesh Ram
| |
Raam,
excellent arguement from your side. I tend to go with Bharat's reply.
Like I have said before, science means knowledge. It need not be nobel prized all the time. And there is no end in explaining a phnom at all.
In Science, each step stops at a micro or macro level and tend to say that is the answer. Each generation of scientist go a little more micro than the previous and explain things. Each micro level tends to become macro with further investigation and proofs. Or tend to go a different route to explain things.
So is with our religious belief\philosophy. That is why we needed a Adi Sankara, and a madhvachAriar and other siddhars and sAdhus.The Ramas and The Krishnas.
It is just that one tends to side whichever gives more comfort. For example, you tend to be in a comfort zone with religious beliefs and sanadana darma as the "Know it all" philosophy, while I tend to believe neither the philosophy nor the science is whole yet. When will it be the wholesome? IMO, it never will.
I think you are looking at a purposeful life as digital and discrete tri state concept. That is in the sense one follows "the philosophy" or "the science" or both. I think I am for one take Nature as the ground state and think the philosophy and science are trying to explain how these things happen and such are analog state, they just mix and match.
Sometime philosophy\practices explains science better, the other times science explains philosophy\practices better. Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|
