| |
|
| |
Feb 13, 2006 10:19 pm |
|
re: re: re: Indians & Sanadana Darma |
Ganesh Ram
| |
It all depends on what "Nothing" really is.
For example when we hear big bang or our own vedas which starts as "First there was Nothing", and if we have to assume the nothingness in its literal form then we are bound to accept the concept of a superior form that brought something from nothing.
But if we go with "compared to what you see (now), the ones that existed was nothing (equivalent to inertness and attributelessness)", then you will fall easily into evolution theory ( which of course is true).
And that is what Nothing is all about. Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|