Everything is relative... even an absolute is so only in relation to the relative

which would mean both Adi Shankara and mAdhvAchAriar ( just to reach both singular and dual forms) would be correct only related to something when they opined about the Absolute.

The good thing about the whole Sandana Dharma is that it allows one to discuss\view\see\feel\realize it in anyway one wants. And therefore there is nothing wrong in how accept IT(the absolute)is accepted.

That would bring back Raam into this discussion ;-)(he has been silent here for ions now).Was he correct? Was he incorrect? are there differences between correctness and incorrectness?

Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win)