| |
|
| |
Mar 10, 2006 12:30 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Indians & Sanadana Darma |
Ganesh Ram
| |
Raam, I do know you will try explaining the Magic. Keep it coming. Here are my counter args.
1)If vyasA muni did with eye contact, why did he create three different type of person? Was it to get the mahabarathA rolling?
2)we do now know cloning is possible,but by eye contact hmmm.. who knows?
3)There was no pralayam after Rama avatAr or for that matter any of the avatArs.Therefore, the question of world ended and started from scratch is more figurative than what had actually happened.
4)Why is that none of our epics are mentioned in AshokA's time? he became a buddhist, so he ought to have known about buddhism but ramayana and mahabaratha? zilch
5)The thooNilum iruppAn ... thingy, IMHO, does not talk about humans at all. AFAIK, it was supposed to have said by prahalad, when his father Hiranyan asked him, if the so called narayana will be in the pillar, that hiranyan built. To which prahaladan said thus. which would mean,
unnilum , yennilum irukkum iravain, maNilum, marathilum irupavanae.
6) The sum total of all packets of energy is a constant. And that is why you do see that eventhough the births and deaths do not nullify the Brahmam is one. if there are ten human deaths that does not mean there should be ten human births. It means that the portion of energy from these 10 deaths have transformed itself into some other form so as to balance.
7) Since the plants existed in this world before existence of Man, how is man defining the purpose of flower?
8) on Ravana, but who is rama to decide, ravana committed sin? Rama had his own set of misgivings. Ravana would have been at least 30 years older than rama if not more? The only mistake ravana had done, if at all, is to abduct Sita for his pleasure(which is debatable).
9)If god is within you and me and bema and karna and duruyodhana, how could anyone think different from other?Private Reply to Ganesh Ram (new win) |
|
| |
|