|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Jul 08, 2010 3:34 am |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: `in conversation' on wedding and divorce |
charu hasan
| |
Dear LKji,
It is time you learnt how lawyers make living out people who quarrel over issues. In the instant case mentioned where I asked the accused to shed tears and the Sub Judge asked me whether I had the courage to get into the box and admit that I instructed the client to do what he did, remember that I asked Hon. Judge to pass a written order to get me into the box.
Point no 1.. is that the judge did not know that if he orally asks me to get into the box and I refuse it is contempt of court and he can sentence me straight away. I can only appeal against his conviction.
Point No 2. He puts me into the box and asks me what I instructed my client I would say that it is privileged communication between client and his lawyer and cannot be admitted in evidence and the Evidence Act.
Some one can show a way out for the judge to put me on the dock and punish me!
Another point raised by LKji is that Sapthapathi is legal marriage and does not necessarily involve a mangalsutram. Now read the provision that punishes bigamy and polygamy and come back a Brahmin do Sapthapathi with dozen girls at one time for there was no subsisting marriage at the time. Madras has 3% Brahmins and 30% Brahmin lawyers that proves the point. Read the related legislation and come to a decision
Private Reply to charu hasan (new win) |
|
| |
|
