| |
|
| |
Jul 08, 2010 9:13 am |
|
re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: re: Ishrat Jahan was a LeT fidayeen,says Headley -Ti |
padmanabhan ramasubban
| |
//would you object if the "influence" is used in a legally admissible manner? would that not demonstrate contempt for our strong judicial processes? //
So long you do not get caught all influence can be used including accidentally killing the witness/destroying evidence/bumping of legal counsels.( a lawyer cum goonda was bumped of recently while taking food near a court by his rival as reported in Hindu)
The aggrieved party to cry hoarse for justice and be left out on a limb all because of influence used in a legally admissible manner.
No innocent should be punished by law but if they are aggrieved they can wait for kingdoms to come for justice .
Can a innocent aggrieved be punished by delaying justice while it is well within the legal frame work?Private Reply to padmanabhan ramasubban (new win) |
|
| |
|