|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| May 16, 2005 1:29 am |
|
re: re: re: Which blog services are the most SEO friendly? |
Adrian Fusiarski
| |
'Pinging' doesn't ping the 'big three' search engines, just blog search engines. I'm not sure that its that important to be quite honest Dean, its certainly not something that I'd ever consider as a 'must have' on any blog software or content maanagement system I was getting.
You can ping over 15 search engines here just by entering your URL and ticking the desired engines.So its not really a selling point when you can do it so simply anyway. Plus the SE's that will send you the traffic are Google, Yahoo and MSN. The rest are just window dressing to be honest.
http://pingomatic.com/ From the creator of Word Press funnily enough !
I chose Word Press simply because it was all I needed. Mambo is more of a portal look (with more features than I needed) so I would've hacked it and trimmed it down anyway. Word Press had all the features that I needed and a very big development support network. I will get round to utilising Mambo but for another project. Its incredibly well featured and it looks so much better than PHP-Nuke and its spin offs.
Word Press is also neat because you have about 120 templates that you can install, mess about with the look of each of those etc etc.
I think what you need to know is how 'search engine friendly' are all of these. Check out how your site looks to search bots here
http://www.anybrowser.com/EngineView.html
AdePrivate Reply to Adrian Fusiarski (new win) |
|
| |
|
