Ryze - Business Networking Buy Ethereum and Bitcoin
Get started with Cryptocurrency investing
Home Invite Friends Networks Friends classifieds
Home

Apply for Membership

About Ryze


Bigger. Better. Faster. Fewer Ulcers.

Top [This Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts]
<- Previous Next ->

234 hits
Mar 26, 2004 4:06 am re: re: re: re: re: Fewer Ulcers
Steve Hardman
Ken, you are killing me. This is hillarious. Funny how you got so much more out of this than I have... and I was there. So glad you can sense my alterior motives, read my thoughts, read between the lines, and pull the real truth out. I feel cleansed, redeemed, and purged because I have been found out, and the truth of my dark side has been exposed. This is about the silliest exchange I've ever had here and most certainly my last post on the issue. So feel free to swing away Ken.

But gee Ken, seriously... quite a contrast in your posts. You would talk to the nice girl, but I am Chicken Little, spreading evil, excited rancor, likening me to a murderer, and now Napoleon for objecting... whatever! Talk about spreading rancor. I'm glad you cannot be too hard on others or to anxious to find fault. I'd hate to see what you called me if you were.

I'm sensing an awful lot of anger here. And unless it came as a denunciation of MLM businesses and their economic voodoo, I don't see where it comes from.

Not a problem Ken, not to worry. I do not hold it against you personally. Consider the other cheek turned. And I mean that seriously.

As a post-script reply to your last remark, I am sorry to disappoint you on your last personal attack of the night, but if I cannot ethically do business with someone, that's that. I don't check in my wallet first to see if my bills or my ethics come first and I don't check to see if there is a suitable competitive product before caving to ethics. I hope that you were not implying that you do as your comment about "anybody" suggests. Unfortunately, there are an awful lot of people whose ethics are merely preferences.

> Rebecca & Ken Aspinwall wrote: > Matt, >

>I'm with you 100% . . . I was merely concerned about the manner and motive. Also, it appeared that a hidden agenda was there, too. I have a strong gut feeling that the main idea was to tell the people WE WON't DO BUSINESS. It is hard for me to believe that anyone would write off doing business just because of one cigar or a dress. >

>Intuitively, I feel there was more to it than what was being told. What if the product or service was both critical and unique? If there were no suitable supply alternatives, do you think anybody would call up people to raise hell? I don't think so. >

>Anybody seen Napoleon? I thought I felt his spirit.

Private Reply to Steve Hardman (new win)





Ryze Admin - Support   |   About Ryze



© Ryze Limited. Ryze is a trademark of Ryze Limited.  Terms of Service, including the Privacy Policy