|The Innovation Network Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts|
|when money supplies go wild ...||Views: 457|
|Mar 17, 2010 8:13 am||when money supplies go wild ...||#|
When Money Supplies Go Wild!
By James Turk
03/16/10 - The US money supply is much bigger than the official numbers indicate ... $1.25 trillion bigger, to be exact. If you care about the value of the dollars in your pocket, this information should matter greatly to you.
As the financial crisis has unfolded over the last two years, the Federal Reserve has been responding in a variety of unprecedented ways. Therefore, it is logical to assume that these never-before-used actions have altered long-established ways of measuring the US dollar money supply.
The quantity of dollars in circulation is being underreported by relying upon the traditional and now outdated definitions used to calculate M1 and M2. These 'Ms' are calculated and reported by the Federal Reserve based on the following guidelines that identify the several different forms of dollar currency used in commerce:
M1: The sum of currency held outside the vaults of depository institutions, Federal Reserve Banks, and the US Treasury; travelers checks; and demand and other checkable deposits issued by financial institutions (except demand deposits due to the Treasury and depository institutions), minus cash items in process of collection and Federal Reserve float.
M2: M1 plus savings deposits (including money market deposit accounts) and small-denomination (less than $100,000) time deposits issued by financial institutions; and shares in retail money market mutual funds (funds with initial investments of less than $50,000), net of retirement accounts.
These esoteric definitions can be confusing, so let's bring US dollar currency back to basics as the first step to explaining why these definitions are no longer adequate.
There are two types of dollar currency comprising the money supply - cash currency and deposit currency. Both are used in commerce to make payments.
1) Cash Currency
The cash currency we carry around in our pockets is issued by the Federal Reserve. Take a look at one of those green pieces of paper, and you will see that they are labeled as a "Federal Reserve Note". A note is a debt obligation, and a few decades ago one could take that note to a Federal Reserve Bank and ask them to make good on their debt by redeeming it for silver, or until 1933, gold.
These liabilities of the Federal Reserve are no longer redeemable into anything, and are therefore "IOU nothing" currency, a phrase made famous by legendary advocate of sound money, John Exter. Nevertheless, Federal Reserve notes remain a liability of the Federal Reserve.
2) Deposit Currency
Deposit currency is comprised - as its name implies - of dollars on deposit in the banking system. These dollars circulate as currency when payments in commerce are made with checks, wire transfers, plastic cards and the like. In contrast to cash currency which circulates from hand-to-hand, deposit currency circulates from bank account to bank account.
Bank deposits take three standard forms - checking accounts, savings accounts and time deposits. They have different maturities, or tenor, to use a banking term.
Dollars in checking accounts are considered to be the most liquid because they are available on demand. Therefore, they are part of M1 because they are the most likely deposit currency to be used to make a payment in commerce. Dollars in savings accounts are less likely to be used to make a payment, but nonetheless are currency because they are spendable. So they are part of M2, which comprises those dollars less frequently used as currency.
The dollars in time deposits are used even less, but are currency and therefore available for use in commerce when they mature, or immediately if the tenor of the deposit is broken. They are - depending on the size of the deposit - included in M2 or M3, which is no longer disclosed by the Federal Reserve.
Having provided this background information, we can now get to the heart of the matter by looking at how currency is created 'out of thin air' by the Federal Reserve and banks and the impact of their actions on the monetary balance sheet of the US dollar.
Cash currency of course is simply printed, but every note issued is recorded on the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. Basically, the Fed 'monetizes' an asset by turning it into currency.
If, for example, a bank sells a $1 million T-bill to the Fed, the Fed 'pays' for it with $1 million of newly printed cash currency. The Fed records the T-bill as an asset and the cash currency it issued as its liability. These Federal Reserve Notes are the "currency" component in the definition of M1 above.
In the past, the Federal Reserve only created cash currency. However, as the credit crisis erupted two years ago, the Fed began the unprecedented process of creating vast amounts of deposit currency. So instead of purchasing paper from the banking system solely with cash currency, the Federal Reserve since the start of the financial crisis has increasingly relied upon deposit currency to purchase paper.
Regardless how the Federal Reserve pays for the paper it purchases - cash currency or deposit currency - it is creating dollar currency and perforce expanding the money supply. But the traditional definition of M1 does not accurately capture this process when the Fed uses deposit currency to pay for its purchase. In fact, it is totally excluded. Because the Federal Reserve did not create deposit currency in the past, none of the Ms take it into account.
Consequently, the traditional definitions of the Ms are outdated because they do not capture the total quantity of dollars in circulation. Because M1 is underreported, so too is M2.
There has been an unprecedented amount of deposit currency created by the Fed over the past two years. The following chart illustrates this point. It shows the quantity of demand and checkable deposits, i.e., the amount of deposit currency, at the Federal Reserve since December 2002.
[see site for chart]
From December 2002 until the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, the quantity of deposit currency created by the Fed averaged $11.8 billion, an amount that is relatively insignificant compared to total M1. Presently, it stands at a record high of $1,246.2 billion, which of course is highly significant.
More to the point, none of this deposit currency is captured in the traditional definition of the Ms. The quantity of dollar currency is therefore significantly underreported, which is illustrated by the following chart.
[see site for chart]
The Federal Reserve reports M1 to be $1,716 billion as of February 15th. When deposit currency created by the Federal Reserve is added to the traditional definition of M1, M1 after adjustment is actually 170% higher at $2,918 billion. Its annual growth increases to 29.5%, nearly 3-times the rate reported by the Fed and more importantly, is an annual rate of growth in the quantity of dollar currency that is approaching hyperinflationary levels.
The US dollar is being inflated and worryingly, the rate of new currency creation is approaching hyperinflationary levels. Unless the Federal Reserve changes course, the US is headed for a deposit currency hyperinflation like those that plagued much of Latin America in the 1980s and 1990s.
See also: "Economic Capture - Money Power in the World"
Private Reply to James Booth
|Mar 17, 2010 6:34 pm||re: when money supplies go wild ...||#|
|Two ways of looking at this -|
1) How do we fix the problem (return to status quo. ie. a more stable greenback)
2) How do we fix the problem (reconsider the objectives of money, the requirements of the objectives, and the solutions that support the requirements)
The first way may still apply, if in taking the second approach indicates money is the best way of meeting the objectives.
Private Reply to Ken Hilving
|Mar 18, 2010 5:33 pm||re: re: when money supplies go wild ...||#|
John, I was not going to do this here ...
When I floated this "theory" in PS I was still thinking,
"No - this is just crazy, and someone will set me straight."
... but now I feel almost obligated to do the same thing here.
No one has yet challenged me on it.
In a separate thread, so as not to hijack this thread ...
My "theory" about today's money and debt:
"money and debt in today's environment"
Private Reply to James Booth