|
|
|
|
| The Chennai Network Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts |
| God save Indian constitution | Views: 1050 |
| Jul 09, 2010 9:18 am | | God save Indian constitution | # |
charu hasan | |
Without applying their mind to correct the existing unconstitutional provisions Indian Penal Code under sec 497 and 498 where a husband can prosecute a neighbor for enticing away his wife while the no wife can take punitive action against the other woman who commits the same kind of enticement or adultery, Our law makers are sitting and discussing how to look the other way when murders are committed in Khap Panchayaths. One can understand. if murders of temple managers can be ignored and religion provides for committing perjury in court of law with immunity to save an accused, Kaph panchayats do get the due preference to commit murders with immunity. After putting all the modern young men and women under fear of death we can attend to the IPC provision of 497 and 498 where we can treat the lady co-respondent as property and order her to either delivered to the prosecuting husband as done in theft cases or can be destroyed by a court order, as it is done in case of prohibition act or like a weapon of offence in a grave crime. God save the Indian Constitution.
S.Charuhasan
9-7-2010
Private Reply to charu hasan |
| Jul 09, 2010 9:32 am | | re: God save Indian constitution | # |
Lavanya Karalkar | | Charu ..Indian law knows what will be final outcome in the case of a husband being enticed by a other woman. Finally the husband will come back to wife and custody of husband will be decided in favour of the wife.
Eg. Delhi High court decision on the custody of George Fernandes.Private Reply to Lavanya Karalkar |
| Jul 09, 2010 10:53 am | | re: re: God save Indian constitution | # |
Ganesh Ram | | LK(g), yengo oru moolaiyil leasAga Silamboli Kaetkiradhu Private Reply to Ganesh Ram |
| Jul 09, 2010 1:02 pm | | re: God save Indian constitution | # |
Dhakshina Moorthy K M | | @ S.Charuhasan
" how to look the other way when murders are committed in Khap Panchayaths."
Panchayats don't commit murder - it is the individual(s) .
" One can understand. if murders of temple managers can be ignored and religion provides for committing perjury in court of law with immunity to save an accused,"
They need not be ignored but taken cognisance as any other case.
"Kaph panchayats do get the due preference to commit murders with immunity."
The media seems to have given preference to these deaths than other news.
There is no rational for making a new act to deal with such deaths.
"Honour Killing" is a media slang. It is not defined anywhere .
There is enough in Cr PC to take care of these deaths.
Our Charu Sir can enlighten us all on the acts individually.
Private Reply to Dhakshina Moorthy K M |
| Jul 09, 2010 3:19 pm | | re: re: God save Indian constitution | # |
charu hasan | | Kaph panchayat is the one that orders killing.
Taking cognizance (like IT technology) is not all.
Media is not thinking brain. It is only data.
Slang and decent language make no difference.
Cr.P.C. or IPC is not the ultimate authority.
We have to think right …. And not wrong that suits
us.
Private Reply to charu hasan |
 |
|
|
