|The WE CARE FOR CHENNAI Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts|
|Glad to be here.||Views: 389|
|Apr 06, 2005 6:06 am||Glad to be here.||#|
Glad to be here. Thanks to Govind for passing on an invite.
Private Reply to Divakar
|Apr 06, 2005 9:26 am||re: Glad to be here.||#|
| Welcome Mangohead..(thamizhle Mangamandaiya?) Your presence has added colour to this forum.|
Private Reply to Lavanya Karalkar
|Apr 06, 2005 4:56 pm||re: re: Glad to be here.||#|
| Hi LK (B ) & MR.Govind,|
How are things, fufa is over wht next , WCFC - wht next
Looking forward to meet u all
Private Reply to J N
|Apr 07, 2005 6:19 am||re: re: re: Glad to be here.||#|
As of now, WCFC is functioning through this online chat board. This is the phase I of WCFC.
In the phase I life, we will have a lot of opportunities to know each other, exchange and develop our ideas for creating a synergy between of thoughts and future action.
As of now, we have an online membership of about 125, out of which 10-12 are participating in the online chat. This chat board is an excellent medium for knowing each other and we should all nurture this.
There should also be people, who are silent members in the WCFC, who may show a remarkable ability and interest to take part in physical work (programmes), as and when they take place. We will come to know of them, only when we launch such programmes.
It is better to grow steadily now, so that we get the opportunity to know each other in a small circle and develop the much-needed empathy.
I had posted quiet a few msgs on issues concerning Chennai. They are basic infrastructure issues. In this online chat board, we have quiet a few dedicated youngsters, who have identified a few issues and are chatting a solution out. I would like to wait till we reach a critical mass - say 300 online members - and then plan the long term activities.
I am also searching for a few dedicated enthusiasts on whom I can depend on, for ensuring business continuity of WCFC's agenda.
Pl make your presence felt in the chat threads.
Private Reply to Govind Srinivasan