|
|  |
| |
|
| | The Legal Needs Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts | | SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | Views: 401 | | Sep 17, 2006 5:42 am | | SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # | 
SOEB FATEHI | | SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY
MIDDLE INCOME GROUP SCHEME.
1. This scheme is intended to provide legal services to the middle income citizen i.e. citizen whose gross maximum income per month does not exceed Rs.10,000/- and the annual income does not exceed Rs.2,00,000/-.
can anyone interpret the above? income arithmetic i mean?Private Reply to SOEB FATEHI | | Sep 19, 2006 8:38 am | | re: SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # |
Vikas Joshi | | the facilitiy of legal assistance under the scheme is available for those whose economic condition is as specified:
The person's monthly earning should not exceed Rs. 10,000/- gross per month (meaning including PF, Gratuity, Superannunation, etc. from all the source of income of the person put together)
AND
The person's annual earning should not exceed Rs. 2,00,000/-gross per year (meaning including PF, Gratuity, Superannunation, etc. from all the source of income of the person put together)
Private Reply to Vikas Joshi | | Sep 19, 2006 1:41 pm | | re: re: SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # |
SOEB FATEHI | | Thank you Vikasji.
Is it possible for a person who has an income of Rs. 1,99,999/99 gross per year (meaning including PF, Gratuity, Superannunation, etc. from all the source of income of the person put together) to avail of the benefits of the scheme, considering that it is impossible to have an income of Rs. 1,99,999/99 gross per year (meaning including PF, Gratuity, Superannunation, etc. from all the source of income of the person put together) without having a monthly income exceeding Rs.10,000/- (meaning including PF, Gratuity, Superannunation, etc. from all the source of income of the person put together) for at least one month in the year ?Private Reply to SOEB FATEHI | | Sep 22, 2006 5:01 am | | re: re: re: SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # |
Vikas Joshi | | Sorry for replying so late SOEB.
Firstly, I am 26 years old. So no "ji ji" please.
Secondly, I dont know the scheme in toto. Hence I cant say anything about the nittygritties of the same. I had just interpreted the condition you had posted. If you have any url/link to the details of the scheme, kindly let me know and i will see what i can do about it, though i donot guarantee a fast reply.
Private Reply to Vikas Joshi | | Sep 22, 2006 1:49 pm | | re: re: re: re: SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # |
SOEB FATEHI | | Vikasji you do not need to be a day older than your full 26 years to be addressed with respect. I do not have a link but my issue is not with legal 'nittygritties' except that the legal profession has not been able to respond to an anomaly in logic and arithmentic! Private Reply to SOEB FATEHI | | Sep 23, 2006 1:06 pm | | re: re: re: re: re: SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # |
Vikas Joshi | | Thanks for the reply SoebJI
I had noticed the anomaly in the arithmatic. In fact that was the first thing i had noticed (Bad habits of us engineers you see).
But the reason i did not prevail on that matter is because I have seen in lots and lots of place, such and even more confusing and stupid "anomalies".
Still, lets not loose the faith in our legal system (beacuse that is the only recourse available to us poor citizen of India!)
Cheers!
PS. lets drop this "ji" business.Private Reply to Vikas Joshi | | Apr 02, 2007 8:08 am | | re: re: re: re: re: re: SUPREME COURT MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY | # | 
Love Lindsey | | I get your point, Soeb.
In fact, I find it hilarious!
I would like to add the following humor. These are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm and quiet while these exchanges were actually taking place. (I hope Vijay doesn't mind this)
ATTORNEY : When is your birthday?
WITNESS : July 18th.
ATTORNEY : What year?
WITNESS : Every year.
____________________________________
ATTORNEY : What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS : Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY : This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS : Yes.
ATTORNEY : And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS : I forget.
ATTORNEY : You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
___________________________________
ATTORNEY : How old is your son, the one living with you?
WITNESS : Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can't remember which.
ATTORNEY : How long has he lived with you?
WITNESS : Forty-five years.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY : Are you sexually active?
WITNESS : No, I just lie there.
_____________________________________________
ATTORNEY : What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS : He said, "Where am I, Cathy?"
ATTORNEY : And why did that upset you?
WITNESS : My name is Susan.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS : We both do.
ATTORNEY : Voodoo?
WITNESS : We do.
ATTORNEY : You do?
WITNESS : Yes, voodoo.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS : Did you actually pass the bar exam?
___________________________________
ATTORNEY : The youngest son, the twenty-one year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS : Uh, he's twenty-one.
________________________________________
ATTORNEY : Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS : Would you repeat the question?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : So the date of conception of the baby was August 8th?
WITNESS : Yes.
ATTORNEY : And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS : Uh....
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY : She had three children, right?
WITNESS : Yes.
ATTORNEY : How many were boys?
WITNESS : None.
ATTORNEY : Were there any girls?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS : By death.
ATTORNEY : And by whose death was it terminated?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS : He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY : Was this a male or a female?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS : No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS : All my autopsies are performed on dead people.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS : Oral.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS : The autopsy started around 8:30 pm.
ATTORNEY : And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS : No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
______________________________________
ATTORNEY : Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS : Huh?
______________________________________
As for the last!!!
ATTORNEY : Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS : No.
ATTORNEY : Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS : No.
ATTORNEY : Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS : No.
ATTORNEY : So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS : No.
ATTORNEY : How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS : Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY : But could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS : Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
-------------------------------------------------------
No offense meant to the lawyers here, so don't attack me OK :)Private Reply to Love Lindsey | | |
| |
| |
