|
|
|
|
| The Art | Collectors | Investors Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts |
| The collector as connoisseur | Views: 474 |
| Aug 04, 2008 1:26 pm | | The collector as connoisseur | # |
U V Umesh | | Hi folks!
I found this very interesting to read on Hindu:
http://www.hindu.com/mag/2008/07/27/stories/2008072750010100.htm
It gives a lot of meaning to the word of Collectors and how they need to go about collecting!
Cheers!
Umesh U V
Art Consultant
http://www.affordindianart.com/pages/newarrivals.htmlPrivate Reply to U V Umesh |
| Aug 06, 2008 3:30 am | | re: The collector as connoisseur | # |
Ambika Vohra | | Great article Umesh...Thanks Private Reply to Ambika Vohra |
| Aug 08, 2008 4:52 am | | re: The collector as connoisseur | # |
Thomas | | Nice article...a reminder of what art collection should be...especially with all the hype about art being (soley viewed as) an alternative investment vehicle.. Private Reply to Thomas |
| Aug 10, 2008 9:00 am | | re: re: The collector as connoisseur | # |
Amit Chopra | | Art is something which is priceless.I interpret this as something which has a very high value to one person and at the same time valueless to another.
Is there some way of exactly defining what a collector see's in a work to make it valuable?And can another person appreciate the same point in a work?And should someone codify the points which make a painting valuable or not?
I think it is best left to the individual to decide the fine points for appreciating a work or not.
Private Reply to Amit Chopra |
 |
|
|
